alarming result in the current summer tire test from ADAC and Stiftung Warentest: A more than 22 feet longer stopping distance on wet roads a winner different from the rear. In an emergency, the difference between life and health. Still, motorists can use with twelve "good" and eleven "satisfactory" models, a sufficient choice of tires available to good to come over the summer. Seven tires show, however - especially on wet roads - such poor performance that we must discourage the purchase of these products. Sun comes as the best 175er tire, the ContiSportContact 2, when braking on wet roads after a 58.3 feet to a stop, the Italian Dayton needs to 80.4 meters.
were tested tires of two size classes, as they come in the middle class such as the Skoda Octavia (195/65 R15V) was used, and a slightly smaller dimension, the Ford Fiesta and the Citroen C2 (175/65 R14T) fits . In addition to the behavior on dry and wet roads, the noise characteristics, fuel consumption and wear were investigated. In addition, High-speed tests were carried out in the larger dimension two tires (Point S and Chengshan) negatively. The point S passed the stringent ADAC test not, the Chengshan was even simpler by the DIN test.
winner in the 195ern was Vredestein Sportrac 3 with a very balanced ride and the best in wet. At the other end of the 16 tires, there are three low-cost products (Sava intensa hp, Point S Summer Star 2 and Chengshan CSR 66). The Chengshan with extremely low moisture levels shows how poorly these products are designed in part: He has by far the best wear value. In the Sava and at the point S is the weak leadership in the wet side of the reason for the devaluation.
received in the smaller dimension of ContiPremiumContact 2 before the Uniroyal RainExpert the best grades. Again, it was with the Dayton D110 as a "poor" rated tires. The full test is in the March edition of the ADAC and www.adac.de read.
0 comments:
Post a Comment